Who knows an educator or mother of a young child? Today's post is a desperate plea to people who care for our little ones.
Last week findings from a $200 million study by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development were made public- think how that money could have been used IN schools! The study looks at the effects of child care to children's development from infants through high school; the researchers' "subjects" are currently in 6th grade. The observed youth compare in socio-economic status but vary in years spent in child care programs.
One finding released last week is that children who spend 4 years in child care prior to kindergarten are more likely to have behavioral problems up through at least the 6th grade when compared to children who spend two or fewer years in child care. However, the study shows that the difference in behavior between children based on years of child care is extremely small (less than 1 point difference) and the author of the study admits that the child care centers attended for four years were, on average, of lower quality than the centers attended for 1 or 2 years. The assumption from some that child care is hurting your child has NOT been proven, but the effects of environment to a young child does make a difference in that child's development.
Many news stations, including ABC, NBC, FOX, NY Times, and Slate, jumped on this finding as a good time to rag on child care and even, eh-hem, direct some of the blame towards working mothers. Slate's article, "Bad Mommies, Does Day Care Ruin your Kids," has a catchy title but its main point is that raising kids is a woman's career and should be done in the home. Slate's article in its title alone plays on the paranoia of many mothers who work; that they do not spend adequate time with their children and hurt their children for life (but to be fair to Slate, the next day a Slate article entitled "The Kids are Alright," written by senior editor Emily Bazelon calls "Bad Mommies"'s author William Saletan out on his ignorance towards childrearing as a woman's role and since last week "Bad Mommies" appears to have been removed from Slate's pages, but if you find a copy please post!)
While not all news surrounding the report blame mommies for not staying at home (where are the daddies?,) my disappointment deepened irregardless when I found no major publication that took the study release as a way to look beyond good vs. bad child care, and acknowledge the basis for a $200 million study on child care. What is more important than debating the state of our child care is to realize that child care is not going anywhere. Minimum wage in the U.S. has not increased in proportion with today's cost of living. One reason for this is that minimum wage and the poverty level is measured by obtaining the household cost for food and then multiplying it by certain variables. Genetics has allowed us to mass produce food so the price of food has not increased during the past twenty years as much as cost of rent or cost of child care. Thus the national measure of a living wage is not accurate. Inflation of living costs disproportionate to increase in American wages means that more parents need to work full time to support their families. Working twice as hard as the generation prior just to remain middle class leaves no parent to be at home with young children. So let's face our situation today and invest in making child care beneficial to our children's growth!
I lived in North Carolina for part of last year and they have a wonderful statewide star-rating system of child care centers. It is not mandatory for a center to post its number of stars, ranging from 1 as bad to 5 as excellent, but there is serious pressure from families who are aware of the importance of the star system from seeing it on commercials and posters around town. California does not have statewide standards that translate into a comprehensible 5 star-rating scale. Don't you think it is important for more states to have standards for their child care centers so that parents of young children know who to trust their children to while at work?
What are your top 5 criteria in selecting a good child care program for your toddler-aged child? See mine below.
1. 1 adult per 7 students.
2. Child care worker's salary adequate to a living wage.
3. Basic early education training mandatory for all staff.
4. At least one healthy meal offered per day.
5. Sanitary conditions and safe play toys.
Monday, April 2, 2007
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Business and education, how long will they last?
Today I found out that some students from University of California at Berkeley won a 24-hour contest to redesign the failing budget system of Oakland Unified School District (OUSD.) The local news showed video footage of the event, and it looked promising. The contestants who gathered with the purpose of making positive change in Oakland schools were business graduate students from all over the country, some who had not stepped on any elementary, middle, or high school grounds since they were students in grade school 15 years ago.
Footage of the competition showed people laughing, sharing knowledge, and young people looked motivated to make a difference using their expertise in business and economics. The winners of the competition are from UC Berkeley Haas School of Business. Hip-hip-hooray, I think...I hope Berkeley makes us proud and maximizes effectiveness in allocating the sytems's limited funds. I did not get the impression that these students would actually implement the program for free, but rather that they provided the school system with a new design.
I will check in with the progress in a few months and see whether the school is able or willing to implement the winning design and how the funding for this is possible. Can business fall in love with education, and vice versa? Should I believe in this union? Can business support education without putting the integrity of good education at risk at the point when an opportunity arises to make more money? Will education hold its ground and remain confident in what it knows best- academic and human enlightenment? With business comes competition and profit.
I think business students can teach public schools a lot and help them sustain, but I also fear the revival of Coke vending machines in every hallway and daily newscasts in classrooms that begin with 5 minutes of mandatory commercial viewing. A world of opportunity becomes possible when business-minded thinkers take a crack at saving our country's neglected schools; but the inevitable question, for those seriously invested, becomes, how will they make a profit?
Thursday, March 1, 2007
Are you special?
Last weekend I read an article about a private high school in Colorado that specializes in snowboarding. The tuition is around $30,000 per year and the school provides its students with training to become pro boarders. The first question that pops into my mind is, does the pro snowboarder world have space for the number of students this private Colorado high school trains each year? If not, then what's the point of the school other than to make money and say "dude" a lot? My initial image of the school described in the article is of spoiled, self-righteous teenagers who are out of touch with reality and think that they are, literally, too cool for school. Okay, maybe I have watched "The O.C" or "Laguna Beach" two many times. But I have to ask, whose parents in their right minds would pay $30,000 per year to send their child to a high school with a curriculum that lays out the option for students to spend half of each school day snowboarding?
I must also admit, however, that I could not stop daydreaming about the Colorado snowboarding school; those kids must be having the time of their lives! The school boasts about excellent academics so why not be inspired by the breathtaking scenery and top off strong academics with daily lessons in a sport that you love? And then I started to examine possible benefits of such a school. I snowboard and played soccer then volleyball from K-10th grade. I strongly believe in the power of sports to build character, self-estyeem and humbleness. Most athletes, like actors, take risks to improve their technique and experience physical and emotional vulnerability. Also, being part of a team is a powerful way to experience important life lessons about tolerance, indurance, responsibility, loyalty and relationships. It is possible that just as many or more students snowboarding in Colorado's exclusive terrain will grow to be socially responsible citizens as in any public school. Maybe the students in the article are more enlightened than the average high school-er because the students in the article were not only privileged in terms of dollars spent on their high school education but privileged to go to a school that revolves learning opportunities, time and expertise around what their students love.
Too often I hear people complain, myself included, that their primary education was or is too general. We learn to write; we learn a little about the civil war in 4th, 6th, and 11th grade; we learn a little bit about lots of types of math; we learn a little bit about lots of types of sciences; we sit through several choppy classes on how our government works and every so often we read a good book. Scratching the surface of a subject is not enough to understand our world. Learning about a particluar matter well enough to experience all the ups and downs, ins and outs, failures and triumphs and suprises of doing and spending time and focus is what changes us forever and teaches us about ourselves.
I want to go full circle and return to a word I used in the first sentence of this post, specializes. Why not specialize all schools? Why not teach students to follow through with ideas, thoughtfully approach an issue, and understand what they bring to the table as individuals. Confidence and enjoyment come with knowing a subject well, whether it be cooking potato soup or changing your state laws on carbon emissions. I think most public school systems are so afraid of limiting their students that they risk teaching nothing meaningful. Standards are often one dimensional. We emphasize product and not process; general and not specialized.
If you are a high school student and have a passion, even if it is not a big one, why can't adults help you excel at it and explore its potential? Why, in public schools, can't half a school day be spent in general academics and the other half spent learning about something we are naturally curious about? Maybe more schools should be divided by areas of interest rather than residential districts. If you end up not pursuing the interest beyond high school, at least you will have learned crucial life lessons along the way. Even though the government treats us like a number, we must not forget that we are people with unique interests and inclinations. Why is specializing at an early age only reserved for the rich and eccentric, or technical schools where the academics suffer, what about the rest of us?
As ususal, my post ends with an assignment: if you or someone you know goes to any high school that costs close to $30,000 per year please post a comment about what makes your experience in school so special. I am not going to insult you; as someone who may want to open her own school one day, I am seriously curious about the kind of education and life experience you are receiving.
I must also admit, however, that I could not stop daydreaming about the Colorado snowboarding school; those kids must be having the time of their lives! The school boasts about excellent academics so why not be inspired by the breathtaking scenery and top off strong academics with daily lessons in a sport that you love? And then I started to examine possible benefits of such a school. I snowboard and played soccer then volleyball from K-10th grade. I strongly believe in the power of sports to build character, self-estyeem and humbleness. Most athletes, like actors, take risks to improve their technique and experience physical and emotional vulnerability. Also, being part of a team is a powerful way to experience important life lessons about tolerance, indurance, responsibility, loyalty and relationships. It is possible that just as many or more students snowboarding in Colorado's exclusive terrain will grow to be socially responsible citizens as in any public school. Maybe the students in the article are more enlightened than the average high school-er because the students in the article were not only privileged in terms of dollars spent on their high school education but privileged to go to a school that revolves learning opportunities, time and expertise around what their students love.
Too often I hear people complain, myself included, that their primary education was or is too general. We learn to write; we learn a little about the civil war in 4th, 6th, and 11th grade; we learn a little bit about lots of types of math; we learn a little bit about lots of types of sciences; we sit through several choppy classes on how our government works and every so often we read a good book. Scratching the surface of a subject is not enough to understand our world. Learning about a particluar matter well enough to experience all the ups and downs, ins and outs, failures and triumphs and suprises of doing and spending time and focus is what changes us forever and teaches us about ourselves.
I want to go full circle and return to a word I used in the first sentence of this post, specializes. Why not specialize all schools? Why not teach students to follow through with ideas, thoughtfully approach an issue, and understand what they bring to the table as individuals. Confidence and enjoyment come with knowing a subject well, whether it be cooking potato soup or changing your state laws on carbon emissions. I think most public school systems are so afraid of limiting their students that they risk teaching nothing meaningful. Standards are often one dimensional. We emphasize product and not process; general and not specialized.
If you are a high school student and have a passion, even if it is not a big one, why can't adults help you excel at it and explore its potential? Why, in public schools, can't half a school day be spent in general academics and the other half spent learning about something we are naturally curious about? Maybe more schools should be divided by areas of interest rather than residential districts. If you end up not pursuing the interest beyond high school, at least you will have learned crucial life lessons along the way. Even though the government treats us like a number, we must not forget that we are people with unique interests and inclinations. Why is specializing at an early age only reserved for the rich and eccentric, or technical schools where the academics suffer, what about the rest of us?
As ususal, my post ends with an assignment: if you or someone you know goes to any high school that costs close to $30,000 per year please post a comment about what makes your experience in school so special. I am not going to insult you; as someone who may want to open her own school one day, I am seriously curious about the kind of education and life experience you are receiving.
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Ask your parents: my mom was a well-groomed hippy and my dad was a hip nerd
So I have two questions for you. As a kid, my parents and most of my friend's parents were products of the civil rights movement, the feminist era, rock and roll, peace not war and experimenting with drugs and sex; their deepest identity relates to the values of what United States glorifies and labels as hippies of the 1960's. My parents always told me that their parents treated them differently than they treated me while growing up.
It seems to boil down to this:
1) My parents and grandparents had a much harder time understanding one another than my parents and I
2) While my parents would rather have a deep conversation than punish me when I was in touble, their parents would have thought strict punishment is what their children need to keep out of trouble
3) My parents often spoke about real issues and were comfortable letting me know when they didn't know the answer, rather than simply pretending everything is and will be okay
4) Almost nothing was black and white in the house I grew up, while my parents' parents had a firmer grasp on right and wrong for the family
4) My parents usually sociallized with the kids around, while their parents went out a lot on their own
5) Kids' ideas wer almost as important as adults' in the family when I was growing, while children were not allowed to question authority when my parents were kids
Last year I met this man who has a teenage daughter. The man had been a young 1980s punk rock kid who grew up into an adult who still held the same values as a punk rocker: anti-government, loud and fast music, Do-it-yourself attitude, hating hippies, etc.
How do we describe parents today? We need to think about what the world was like when they were teenagers. Most parents of young teenagers were teenagers themselves in the 1990's. What was the world like in 1990s? Globalization was beginning, the Cold War was ending, personal computers were begining to be popular, social issues (like suicide, poverty, AIDS) were hot topics, TV sitcoms like Seinfield, Friends were big, boy bands came into existence, grunge was on MTV and political correctness entered the spotlight. Ask your parents about what they were thinking of during the 1990s.
My two questions for you:
1) Do you think your parents relate better to you than they did with their own parents?
2) Do you know what kinds of people your parents were when they were your age or a little older?
It seems to boil down to this:
1) My parents and grandparents had a much harder time understanding one another than my parents and I
2) While my parents would rather have a deep conversation than punish me when I was in touble, their parents would have thought strict punishment is what their children need to keep out of trouble
3) My parents often spoke about real issues and were comfortable letting me know when they didn't know the answer, rather than simply pretending everything is and will be okay
4) Almost nothing was black and white in the house I grew up, while my parents' parents had a firmer grasp on right and wrong for the family
4) My parents usually sociallized with the kids around, while their parents went out a lot on their own
5) Kids' ideas wer almost as important as adults' in the family when I was growing, while children were not allowed to question authority when my parents were kids
Last year I met this man who has a teenage daughter. The man had been a young 1980s punk rock kid who grew up into an adult who still held the same values as a punk rocker: anti-government, loud and fast music, Do-it-yourself attitude, hating hippies, etc.
How do we describe parents today? We need to think about what the world was like when they were teenagers. Most parents of young teenagers were teenagers themselves in the 1990's. What was the world like in 1990s? Globalization was beginning, the Cold War was ending, personal computers were begining to be popular, social issues (like suicide, poverty, AIDS) were hot topics, TV sitcoms like Seinfield, Friends were big, boy bands came into existence, grunge was on MTV and political correctness entered the spotlight. Ask your parents about what they were thinking of during the 1990s.
My two questions for you:
1) Do you think your parents relate better to you than they did with their own parents?
2) Do you know what kinds of people your parents were when they were your age or a little older?
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Alpha Kitty, eh?
Hi. So in researching other sites that already exist I found a few. One called "In the Mix," a TV show on PBS that focuses on topics and dialogues brought to the foreground by youth. If you have seen "In the Mix," please let me know what you think of it. Do you think the show speaks from a teen's point of view or an adults point of view? Here's another question for anyone to answer, what do you use to express yourself? Video, internet blogs, myspace, journal, phone, tape recorder...And why?
On another note, I saw this article online (see "Say Hello To Alpha Kitty" below.) The article is about a woman advertising herself before having a company. No one knows what she does! She has 43,000 friends on MySpace and she left her job at Seventeen Magazine to become her own version of queen of the teenage girls. Yet, she has not shown us what her company or website will actually do. She is trying to win fans only bassed on her personality. To me this sounds like a cheap Paris Hilton strategy of being famous because everyone sees her in magazines or at parties. Yet, I am interested in seeing if she will make it big and who her audience will be...teenager girls or business people. Check her out, google "Atoosa Rubenstein," and please tell me what you think. Is she smart and cool or a self-centered businesswoman failing to impress teens? Would you ever market yourself like this, do you think its a good idea?
READ ARTICLE BELOW:
"Say Hello To Alpha Kitty"
In certain mediacentric precincts of Manhattan and Los Angeles, a striking and charismatic young woman named Atoosa Rubenstein moves from handshake to handshake, from meeting with advisers to pitching potential financial backers. In this, Rubenstein resembles a Presidential candidate testing the waters in Iowa. But her campaign is to build the next big multimedia brand around a person. This person happens to be named Atoosa Rubenstein.
She is about to find out if her status within an insular sphere—as a star magazine editor with fashion cred—and more than 43,000 friends on MySpace.com (NWS ) can propel her to something much grander. For this ill-defined opportunity, centering initially on the unbuilt Web site atoosa.com, Rubenstein last year dumped her job as editor-in-chief of Seventeen. "I saw what was coming," she said, referring to the ongoing Web-driven destruction of the teen magazine. "What I want to do is gather my tribe"—yes, Rubenstein actually says things like this—"the ones reading Seventeen, and the ones who were, and grew out of it." This tribe is 13 to 30, female, thoroughly digital, and, in Rubenstein's view, lacking an "alpha kitty" addressing their concerns and sensibility. What she brings is her big-sister, geek-gone-glam persona. She honed this act editing Seventeen and teen title CosmoGIRL, and now shows it in full plumage in her MySpace blog entries, which are a riot of excessive capitalization and estrogenic display. The ultimate shape of Atoosa Inc. is inchoate, but Rubenstein is certain of one thing. "The next Oprah will not be born on TV," she says. "I left to launch my brand."
SHE ALREADY HAS, OF COURSE. Rubenstein's got the high-wattage personality and presence that gets noticed, and she possesses ambition that's impossible to miss. It is not just anyone who gets named editor-in-chief of a major magazine at 26, which is how old Rubenstein was in 1998 when she started CosmoGIRL. "You thought, she had to do it,'" says Hearst Magazines President Cathleen Black, recalling the first meeting in which Rubenstein described that magazine. "It was seeping out of her pores."
These days Rubenstein's parent company is her own Big Momma Productions, which explains the enormous ring that emblazons "big momma" across three fingers, (a gift from her husband, she explains). In a meeting, she says about her audience, without apparent irony: "They are unborn to me, but they're mine." Still, her sense of ownership and her furiously fashionista exterior is often punctured by glimpses of the homespun and deeply idiosyncratic. At a meeting with potential investors she skips PowerPoint in favor of construction paper decorated, grade school project-style, with a crazy-quilt of colored pencil notations. Her first offering may be what she terms her "art project," Psychic Kitty, a series of psychedelicized videos on her MySpace page. They will star her cat Thurston spouting, in Rubenstein's electronically processed voice, brief inspirational tidbits. Rubenstein calls Psychic Kitty "the cat in the family," and she's mum on a debut date: "You know how it is with cats."
You may, like me, find Psychic Kitty so bent as to be half-brilliant. But what I find conceptually neat isn't relevant; the question is how weird the mainstream is willing to get. Of course, well-conceived media brands that assuage the spiritual thirst of American women have an impressive track record. (Ask Oprah.) "I have a dream," says Rubenstein. "I see a family. I see a tribe. At the end of the day, I know how to connect with this audience." Rubenstein says her brand attributes—again, she really does this—are inspiration and motivation, sisterhood, positivity, and activism. Wreathed around that is a certain Atoosa-ness: an ease with the off-the-wall, an acceptance of the mess and dorkiness of existence. Rapt comments on her blog suggest at least some receptivity for this message. We will soon see if the smoke signals she's sending out, in all her inimitable style, can gather a tribe big enough to make a business.
For Jon Fine's blog on media and advertising, go to www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia
On another note, I saw this article online (see "Say Hello To Alpha Kitty" below.) The article is about a woman advertising herself before having a company. No one knows what she does! She has 43,000 friends on MySpace and she left her job at Seventeen Magazine to become her own version of queen of the teenage girls. Yet, she has not shown us what her company or website will actually do. She is trying to win fans only bassed on her personality. To me this sounds like a cheap Paris Hilton strategy of being famous because everyone sees her in magazines or at parties. Yet, I am interested in seeing if she will make it big and who her audience will be...teenager girls or business people. Check her out, google "Atoosa Rubenstein," and please tell me what you think. Is she smart and cool or a self-centered businesswoman failing to impress teens? Would you ever market yourself like this, do you think its a good idea?
READ ARTICLE BELOW:
"Say Hello To Alpha Kitty"
In certain mediacentric precincts of Manhattan and Los Angeles, a striking and charismatic young woman named Atoosa Rubenstein moves from handshake to handshake, from meeting with advisers to pitching potential financial backers. In this, Rubenstein resembles a Presidential candidate testing the waters in Iowa. But her campaign is to build the next big multimedia brand around a person. This person happens to be named Atoosa Rubenstein.
She is about to find out if her status within an insular sphere—as a star magazine editor with fashion cred—and more than 43,000 friends on MySpace.com (NWS ) can propel her to something much grander. For this ill-defined opportunity, centering initially on the unbuilt Web site atoosa.com, Rubenstein last year dumped her job as editor-in-chief of Seventeen. "I saw what was coming," she said, referring to the ongoing Web-driven destruction of the teen magazine. "What I want to do is gather my tribe"—yes, Rubenstein actually says things like this—"the ones reading Seventeen, and the ones who were, and grew out of it." This tribe is 13 to 30, female, thoroughly digital, and, in Rubenstein's view, lacking an "alpha kitty" addressing their concerns and sensibility. What she brings is her big-sister, geek-gone-glam persona. She honed this act editing Seventeen and teen title CosmoGIRL, and now shows it in full plumage in her MySpace blog entries, which are a riot of excessive capitalization and estrogenic display. The ultimate shape of Atoosa Inc. is inchoate, but Rubenstein is certain of one thing. "The next Oprah will not be born on TV," she says. "I left to launch my brand."
SHE ALREADY HAS, OF COURSE. Rubenstein's got the high-wattage personality and presence that gets noticed, and she possesses ambition that's impossible to miss. It is not just anyone who gets named editor-in-chief of a major magazine at 26, which is how old Rubenstein was in 1998 when she started CosmoGIRL. "You thought, she had to do it,'" says Hearst Magazines President Cathleen Black, recalling the first meeting in which Rubenstein described that magazine. "It was seeping out of her pores."
These days Rubenstein's parent company is her own Big Momma Productions, which explains the enormous ring that emblazons "big momma" across three fingers, (a gift from her husband, she explains). In a meeting, she says about her audience, without apparent irony: "They are unborn to me, but they're mine." Still, her sense of ownership and her furiously fashionista exterior is often punctured by glimpses of the homespun and deeply idiosyncratic. At a meeting with potential investors she skips PowerPoint in favor of construction paper decorated, grade school project-style, with a crazy-quilt of colored pencil notations. Her first offering may be what she terms her "art project," Psychic Kitty, a series of psychedelicized videos on her MySpace page. They will star her cat Thurston spouting, in Rubenstein's electronically processed voice, brief inspirational tidbits. Rubenstein calls Psychic Kitty "the cat in the family," and she's mum on a debut date: "You know how it is with cats."
You may, like me, find Psychic Kitty so bent as to be half-brilliant. But what I find conceptually neat isn't relevant; the question is how weird the mainstream is willing to get. Of course, well-conceived media brands that assuage the spiritual thirst of American women have an impressive track record. (Ask Oprah.) "I have a dream," says Rubenstein. "I see a family. I see a tribe. At the end of the day, I know how to connect with this audience." Rubenstein says her brand attributes—again, she really does this—are inspiration and motivation, sisterhood, positivity, and activism. Wreathed around that is a certain Atoosa-ness: an ease with the off-the-wall, an acceptance of the mess and dorkiness of existence. Rapt comments on her blog suggest at least some receptivity for this message. We will soon see if the smoke signals she's sending out, in all her inimitable style, can gather a tribe big enough to make a business.
For Jon Fine's blog on media and advertising, go to www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Is myspace enough?
NOTE: My mission has changed to discuss education and what is working in communities, and questioning what is not. Below is an outdated mission for the blog.
I just returned from a friend's house and decided to post before watching Jonathan Richman in "Take me to the Plaza." If you like the Velvet Underground, you may want to check him out.
I think part of the potential success for Thunderbolt World is that it fullfills a void online. I want teenagers to WANT to go to the site, find it easy to use and have it fit into their lives. Are there organizations or websites that exist with a mission similar to mine: providing space and support towards connecting teenagers with eachother to discuss relevant issues and communicate their ideas on the state of our world and ways to make positive change? Is myspace, nerdspace, etc. enough for you to express yourselves? Is there a better site than myspace for teens that already exists? Are internet chatrooms still a popular way to express your deepest thoughts when you cannot use the phone? If you or someone you know is aware of other groups with websites similar to the idea behind Thunderbolt World, or ones you think I should look at, please post a comment and let me know. Thanks!
I just returned from a friend's house and decided to post before watching Jonathan Richman in "Take me to the Plaza." If you like the Velvet Underground, you may want to check him out.
I think part of the potential success for Thunderbolt World is that it fullfills a void online. I want teenagers to WANT to go to the site, find it easy to use and have it fit into their lives. Are there organizations or websites that exist with a mission similar to mine: providing space and support towards connecting teenagers with eachother to discuss relevant issues and communicate their ideas on the state of our world and ways to make positive change? Is myspace, nerdspace, etc. enough for you to express yourselves? Is there a better site than myspace for teens that already exists? Are internet chatrooms still a popular way to express your deepest thoughts when you cannot use the phone? If you or someone you know is aware of other groups with websites similar to the idea behind Thunderbolt World, or ones you think I should look at, please post a comment and let me know. Thanks!
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Thunderbolt World
I believe in helping youth succeed in carrying out their own ideas and changing our world for the better. We need to learn from and be inspired by each other, not corporate advertising companies. Teenagers have power and know how to express their power but need a new vehicle for their expression. Through a new website I hope to provide a place for youth entrepreneurship, thought-provoking dialogue and idea exchanging between people all over the world, and relevant knowledge that big business and government might not want you to know, but could make the world a better place.
This blog is especially directed towards the sharp minds of youth, ages 12-18, who have a voice and would like to be heard, and people of all ages who believe in the unique potential of this age group. I am creating a website designed to connect innovative teenagers with each other and the world around them.
The site features mini-videos and podcasts starring youth from around the country with something to say or something they have created. Anyone can be in these videos/podcasts. For example, say you have been handcrafting your own shoulder bags or think you write music better than anyone on MTV; write to me and we will try and showcase your work or ideas to your peers. The mini-videos/podcasts can also be about someone who inspires you, something important to you about your friends, family or community, or a topic you would like to express your opinion on- such as what it means to go college, how drugs have affected your life, what has changed in your life since the war, your favorite website to visit, what do you think about product (red) and using global marketing to help people dying of AIDS, or what you think is the worst fashion statement so far in 2007. The site will expand off of these videos and podcasts and provide supplemental knowledge to help further develop the raw and real-to-life content brought to the foreground by today's youth; bringing in special guests and other relevant resources and facts.
What do you think? If you want to get involved on any level, I encourage people of all ages to write me back or give your feedback on anything. If you like the ideas in my blog, pleaseforward this blog to five of your friendsor family and get them involved. I am blogging to get a feel of whether people would dig on this kind of project. Is this a site you would go to after school/work? What would attract you to a site for youth to connect and share? This blog is for youth, mentors, artists, activists, professional people, educators, and elders to post on. Let's connect in a quality dialogue on what matters, what is needed, in our world. Let's support each other's artwork, music, writing, education, technology, talents and personal triumphs. Let's become a thriving community of ideas and creativity!
Power to the people!
This blog is especially directed towards the sharp minds of youth, ages 12-18, who have a voice and would like to be heard, and people of all ages who believe in the unique potential of this age group. I am creating a website designed to connect innovative teenagers with each other and the world around them.
The site features mini-videos and podcasts starring youth from around the country with something to say or something they have created. Anyone can be in these videos/podcasts. For example, say you have been handcrafting your own shoulder bags or think you write music better than anyone on MTV; write to me and we will try and showcase your work or ideas to your peers. The mini-videos/podcasts can also be about someone who inspires you, something important to you about your friends, family or community, or a topic you would like to express your opinion on- such as what it means to go college, how drugs have affected your life, what has changed in your life since the war, your favorite website to visit, what do you think about product (red) and using global marketing to help people dying of AIDS, or what you think is the worst fashion statement so far in 2007. The site will expand off of these videos and podcasts and provide supplemental knowledge to help further develop the raw and real-to-life content brought to the foreground by today's youth; bringing in special guests and other relevant resources and facts.
What do you think? If you want to get involved on any level, I encourage people of all ages to write me back or give your feedback on anything. If you like the ideas in my blog, pleaseforward this blog to five of your friendsor family and get them involved. I am blogging to get a feel of whether people would dig on this kind of project. Is this a site you would go to after school/work? What would attract you to a site for youth to connect and share? This blog is for youth, mentors, artists, activists, professional people, educators, and elders to post on. Let's connect in a quality dialogue on what matters, what is needed, in our world. Let's support each other's artwork, music, writing, education, technology, talents and personal triumphs. Let's become a thriving community of ideas and creativity!
Power to the people!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
